Creative minds see potential everywhere, but in this economy, frugality is key. The Memorial Art Gallery's second edition of the "Extreme Materials" exhibit reminds me of the challenge issued once a month by the now-kaput DIY magazine, Ready Made: make something artful or useful from this junk. Many visitors to this show will geek out over the shocking use of unexpected art supplies. Others will philosophize about mass production and clever forms of recycling. From blood to bone, bullets to Band-Aids, and cereal to circuitry, this exhibit features work by artists who creatively re-envision the overlooked into new items and meanings.
Viewers get their first taste of the exhibit when they pass through the glass doors in the MAG atrium. The public was invited to watch the installation of "Ecosystem," a swirling pattern made from mass-produced plastic soup spoons, by Nick Kozak on October 13-15, generating excitement over the reprisal of the beloved "Extreme Materials" exhibition (the MAG presented the original in 2006). The swarm of familiar objects circle and sprout, seeming to nod to baroque plaster-relief sculptural design, and is an extreme version of a creative reuse of items we encounter daily but inevitably deep-six.
In the Grand Gallery space, viewers immediately encounter the garishly colored "Firework Drawing No. 9" by Rosemarie Fiore, which is a mammoth work made from lit firework residue on paper. The varying, shimmering gun-powder marks made by the pyrotechnics were trimmed and pieced together to create a work that is reminiscent of Jackson Pollock's kinetic style, if Jack The Dripper had worked in a more combustible medium.
Mark Wagner created one of the most interesting pieces in the show, "Fortune's Daughter," made of $1 bills cut and reassembled into a life-sized nude woman. The currency's filigree, foliage, and feathers are re-imagined and formed into a statue standing in an ornate reliquary. Wagner exercised a brilliant use of the single material, from slicing the dollars lengthwise to give them curves, to creating a realistically bushy bush, creating a Venus birthed not from the surf but from legal tender; an ornate portrait that plays on the old method of stowing money away in valuables, such as artwork.
Other portraits in the show were rendered in a variety of materials, including the Shroud of Turin-like rust-on-paper "Opal Brunner" by Esther Solonndz, the lit-from-behind packing-tape wonder "Lydmila" by Mark Khaisman, the screws, paint, and phone book pages in "An Artist's Winter" by Andrew Myers, and the masterfully painted (with the artist's own menstrual blood) "Corpus Regis" by Jess von der Ahe.
Other "shocking" body-related materials include a dress made of condoms and a wedding cake made of tampons, but those left me feeling underwhelmed. More interesting are two other potential gross-outs that were totally engrossing. "Negligee #2 (Serotonin)" by Laura Splan, which is a gossamer dress made of cosmetic facial peel, a gel that retains impressions of pores and hairs, and is embroidered with the molecular structure of serotonin, the neurotransmitter associated with feelings of well-being, sleep, and sex (hence the nightie). This delicate work had me wondering how many ripped samples the artist must have gone through before perfecting one garment. Jennifer Sirey's "Albino and Dream" is a thin, upright glass slab filled with water, vinegar, monofilaments, and populated by a slumbering, cloud-like skin of bacteria. The watery microcosm is pale and lovely, born of remnant wine and set to sleep in water: "the final piece is alive," says the artist, "but in a state of hibernation."
Emotionally stirring works include "The Wave" by Tom Deininger, which in its swirling mass of discarded items more than hints at the abundance of plastic waste in the oceans, and gives onlookers the feeling of being swallowed up. Mary Giehl's "Crystal Dress" and "Crystal Vest" face one another, garments based with plastic drawer liners, alum, and monofilaments, but ultimately covered in chunky pale crystals the artist coaxed to grow over her armatures. The statement reports that Giehl is "deeply affected by the victims of child abuse placed in her care" as a pediatric intensive-care nurse. Lit from within, the garments relay her hope that "purity of the mistreated has survived at the deepest level." I couldn't help but make a strange association from the concept to the artist's own act of manipulating something that was growing, unconscious of that manipulation.
Also moving is Suzanne Broughel's flesh-tone-mandala, "40 Acres of Bandaids (Every Shade of Bandaid for Sale Within 40 Acres of the African Burial Ground, NYC)." The adhesive bandages are arranged in a geometric pattern, moving in bands of color toward the dark center. "By using these to create a ‘black hole' at the center of her mosaic of skin colors," says the infocard, "she references not only the fate of those consigned to the unmarked graves in lower Manhattan, but also the ways in which African-American consumers have often been disregarded by the manufacturing industry." The other edge of the sword, of course, is caught up in the lack of genuine patches for our ailing race-relations history and present.
Jennifer Angus's "Creature Comforts" is possibly the star of the exhibition, and is a show unto itself. Angus's installation is not housed in the Grand Gallery, but given its own room in the smaller Lockhart Gallery, where viewers will find hundreds, perhaps thousands of colorful beetles and bugs, beeswax, and other media.
Angus nails it when she speaks of insect life as simultaneously attracting us with its beauty and diversity, and horrifying us because of how outnumbered we are by their legions and alien nature. In the provided statement, the artist says she hopes to call attention to the important role that insects play, which would seem ironic in that her art deals in their demise. But the statement also claims that Angus works with "reputable specimen dealers" and reuses the insects in many installations. The vibrant greens and blues of the bugs are set off glowingly, pinned to bright yellow and orange walls.
Beetles form the shapes of a sea monster and two skulls, from the mouths of the latter flow giant, beautiful flies. A low, narrow shelf holds beeswax shaped into skulls, flowers, coral, and various animals, in colors from black to pale yellow. Pinned below the shelves are large insects that could effectively disguise themselves as leaves, about 6" to 8" long, with leathery hides and spiny legs, as well as jewel-like, egg-shaped beetles. Dozens of circular cases, glass bubbles jutting out from the wall, hold what are surely artist-assembled hybrids: large beetles with butterfly wings; tiny beetles with heavy, elongated butterfly wings trailing behind them like peacock tails; and giant, legless grasshoppers that resemble fish.
In two display cases, wooden Victorian dollhouses are covered in beeswax, and populated by countless pinned-up beetles, tintypes of bugs (a nod to Rochester's photo history), and real bug heads and arms adhered to frilly wax dresses. Wax sheep form a wee flock in one section. Elsewhere a group of bugs circle a tiny funeral with a wax coffin.
Both times I viewed this work, I wondered whether this ongoing industry for collections and artwork would ever get the same sort of protests that the impending Otterness installation at the MAG is receiving. To avoid damage and retain maximum malleability, the brutal "killjar" method is employed to suffocate insects. Do these deaths have less of an impact on many of us because the insects are more alien, more pest-like, less amicable than a dog? This installation inevitably brings up questions about the hierarchy of animal importance, why the suffering of some disturbs us more than the suffering of others.
"Extreme Materials 2"
Through January 15
Memorial Art Gallery, 500 University Ave.
$5-$12 | 276-8900, mag.rochester.edu
Wed-Sun 11 a.m.-5 p.m., Thu 11 a.m.-9 p.m.





Comments for "ART REVIEW: "Extreme Materials 2"" (4)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Beth Brown said on Oct. 26, 2011 at 1:17pm
The MAG is forever promoting extreme materials. They are currently funding an artist who shot his dog to death for his own art film. A freshly shot and killed dog is pretty extreme indeed!! It's not surprising that they have a whole installation made out of thousands of dead insects. It's hard to defend the rights of living creatures when big institutions like this continue to reward violators of those rights. Animals not only feed our bellies, but feed the ego of the artist..
John Carbonaro said on Nov. 02, 2011 at 4:50pm
Rebecca said : "Both times I viewed this work, I wondered whether this ongoing industry for collections and artwork would ever get the same sort of protests that the impending Otterness installation at the MAG is receiving".
What I find great is that Rebecca may be looking at bugs in a different way because of the protests. She may be looking beyond the art to see the beings for the beings they are, not the mere 'ingredients' of the piece. People can transcend their socialization to see the animals in and of themselves, not as food, clothing, dissection materials, entertainment performers, or any other objectified resources put into place through hierarchical thinking.
Rebecca Rafferty said on Nov. 02, 2011 at 8:57pm
John: Actually, I have long felt this way about bugs, and my ideas were enhanced by a philosophy class which clearly introduced to me how we culturally place hierarchies on different animals (and it varies from culture to culture). I've always had trouble with the idea of killing things, no matter how minute, and prefer to carry bugs outdoors rather than squash them or get out the can of raid. I find insect life to be rich and fascinating, if alien and on a seriously smaller scale. And yet, I have been a renewed carnivore for the past 2 years, fully aware of the horrors and suffering involved in our food system, not only to individual animals, but in that we decimate ecosystems with our mindless consumption. Yet few of us are directly involved in the slaughter, so the blow of our involvement in it is softened. But still we are involved. I feel the issue should be looked at with active consideration toward all of the varied ethical complexities before stones are thrown. I don't feel that anyone can justifiably cast stones.
While not excusing the horrible act from Otterness's past, I wanted to point out that all of our hands are dirty; whether of not you can see this is a matter of how you are choosing to look at things. How many of us own iPhones, or mourned the death of heroic Steve Jobs? How many of us would give up the iPhones or speak out against his legacy if made fully aware of the sweatshop conditions the gadgets are made in, even after Mr. Jobs was made aware of 34 hour shifts and suicides by workers? Indeed, his company's answer to this awareness was to place bars on windows and nets underneath to prevent further jumpers. That's all. So, who's throwing out their Apple products?
Great reading on the subject of our ability to justify our terrible actions with wanton irrationality is the essay, "Consider the Lobster," by David Foster Wallace. The willingness to be honest with yourself is one of the most valuable tools you can learn.
I do not mean to tell anyone what to do or how to live, but I do think it's wise to remove any and all blinders when approaching anything. We're complicated. Willingness to examine complications is the way toward understanding each other. Truth isn't tidy. Or, take it from Oscar Wilde: "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."
John Carbonaro said on Nov. 06, 2011 at 6:54pm
I know some people justify not changing their own behavior by blending it in with the interconnectedness of exploitation.Its called cognitive dissonance, using defense mechanisms to bridge the inconsistencies between our core values and our actions that don't seem to reflect them. There is also an interconnectedness of the good that can be expanded upon. I would rather have someone point out things that help me make my choices more ethically consistent . We all can and should continue to do better. I can't help but to kill bugs tilling the garden for my vegan food, but that doesn't mean I might as well turn around and head for the meat market. You can directly help bugs go free but you may not be able to free the animals now headed for slaughter. Yet we can embrace an ethical baseline that takes the interests of bugs and cows and dogs and children in 3rd world countries etc. not be be treated as commodities. Patriarchical hierarchies have made both humans (women, minorities) and animals into mere resources or beings of lesser importance. We don't need to wait for pure truth or perfect behavior on the part of others to account for our own personal ethical behaviors, even it it means being the 1%.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.