The Republican Party's search for a presidential candidate has been so entertaining that you kinda hope it'll just go on and on.
All the show needed was to have Donald Trump jump into the middle of it, preening and puffing and once again promoting Celebrity Apprentice. (New season starts February 12!) And, of course, we do have Donald - and a bunch of Republicans literally genuflecting before the Trump throne, seeking his endorsement.
But this is serious business. Somebody from this astonishing field, presumably, will be Barack Obama's opponent next November.
You might have thought the circus would be over in a couple of months - that after the early caucuses and primaries, either Mitt Romney or somebody else would be a clear winner. But there's a good bit of speculation that the Republican race might go on until at least April 1. The reason: this year, few of the early-voting states will have winner-take-all primaries. As The Hill and other media have noted, thanks to new Republican National Committee rules, delegates will be awarded proportionately in these states. And thanks to penalties assessed on states that moved up their primaries, fewer delegates will be at stake this winter. So it's possible that no candidate will be so far ahead that someone else can't catch up.
Adding to the fun: even if both Romney and Newt Gingrich are far ahead of the others come spring, some of the also-rans may decide to stick around. Because of the proportional voting, they'll be picking up a few delegates here and there. (Why would they do that? Power. At some point, one of the leading candidates may need their delegates.)
All this would be exciting - and good for the country - if most of these people were qualified to serve, if their differences were matters of political philosophy and governing approach. Instead, most of them are right-wing fringe candidates whose ascent to the presidency would be downright dangerous. (Want a war with Iran and North Korea? Want to pour oil on the Israeli-Palestinian fire?)
Fortunately, some party elites are as worried as anyone, particularly about Gingrich's rise to the top of the polls. A big concern: his temperament. And tellingly, some of his harshest critics are Republicans who have worked with him in the past.
There could be more drama to come. Some observers suggest that Republican leaders will persuade someone like Mitch Daniels or Chris Christie to enter the race this spring. Or that Sarah Palin will jump in.
For the Obama campaign, this may all be deliciously good news. And for journalists covering the race, it sure is fun. But it's risky fun. About the only advantage I can find in it is this: maybe the leaders of the Republican Party, once a proud and valuable political institution, will come to their senses and break the stranglehold on themselves that they've permitted the right wing to create.





Comments for "URBAN JOURNAL: The Republicans' circus" (4)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Animule said on Dec. 14, 2011 at 7:44pm
"All this would be exciting - and good for the country - if most of these people were qualified to serve..."
The pot calling the kettle black.
Barack Hussein Obama is arguably the least qualified president in modern American history. Elected to the Senate after a sex scandal scuttled the campaign of his primary competitor, Obama's sum total of political experience on the national level was a fraction of a term in the U.S. Senate.
Did he run a state? No. Did he run a city? No. Did he run a county? No. Did he run a company? No. The only thing Barak Hussein Obama ran prior to being elected President of the United States was his mouth. Maggie Brooks has more experience running an organization than this clown.
Mitt Romney alone has been a CEO, Governor of a major state, has run the Winter Olympics and more. Mitt Romney has forgotten more about how to manage people and organizations than President "hope and change" has ever known.
Most importantly, Mitt Romney is competent, which is more than anyone can say about Barak Hussein Obama.
Craig said on Dec. 15, 2011 at 12:21pm
It's also amusing when leftists pine for the good old days of the republican party. It allows them to posture as older and wiser and use their primary rhetorical tool, derision, without actually addressing any content.
J said on Dec. 15, 2011 at 7:24pm
Ron Paul 2012
David Miller said on Dec. 15, 2011 at 11:17pm
Mary Anna's still stuck in the language of the dying two-party system. No doubt both parties will work hard once again trying to convince us that they are different, but GITMO, Patriot Acts, Debt, and multiple Wars now span across Bush, Obama, and all of the presidential candidates with the exception of Ron Paul.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.